that under the scale previmal in force, issued 29th May, 1805, there was no fee specified for the Certificate of Registration, which was not formerly always furnished, and as such a fee was not inserted in the new scale, I am of opinion that it is only reasonable to charge it in cases where the applicant for Registration specifically asks for the Certificate in addition to a copy of the usual Notification as issued in the Gazette, while in cases where the Certificate is not asked for, it need not be furnished.
3. In reply to the P.S. to Sir Des Voeux's despatch No. 816 of 20th March, in the third paragraph of which I have to refer you to my despatch No. 79 of 12th April 1889, in which I expressed the opinion that a fee of $2.50 was sufficient for the Registration of a Trademark, and asked for the Government's...
(The text appears to be cut off here, and the original page layout is unclear. However, based on the given instructions, the above output is a faithful representation of the input text with corrections for spelling, spacing, and minor reordering where necessary.)
that under the scale
previmal in force, issued 29 the any. 1805,
there
fee specified
for the Certificate of Registration, which
wa
not
Formerly always furnished,
and as such a fe in
fight inserted in the
Раш new scale, I am of
opinion that it is
ismable to
only reasmal
Chanze
it in cases
where the applicant for Registration specifically ask for the Certificate in addition to a copy of the usual Notification
>
as issued in
Na
Sazette, while in
400
cases where the Certificate
te is not
asked for, it need not be furnished.
3. In reply to the P.S. par to sing. Des Voeux's desp. 816) 20th March th the third par. of
state the day! =
under ach? I have to
refer yo
to my des
no. 79 of 12th April
79712
1889, in which I
expressed the opinion that a fee of 7825 was sufficient für the Registration of Trademark, and asked for the Govern news
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.